4.7 Article

Whole-brain magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging measures are related to disability in ALS

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 80, 期 7, 页码 610-615

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318281ccec

关键词

-

资金

  1. Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre
  2. Medical Research Council
  3. Motor Neurone Disease Association UK Lady Edith Wolfson Fellowship
  4. Motor Neurone Disease Association UK Care Centre Program
  5. NIH [R01EB000822]
  6. MRC [MR/K01014X/1, G0701923] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/C519938/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Medical Research Council [MR/K01014X/1, G0701923] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Motor Neurone Disease Association [Turner/Jan13/944-795] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To demonstrate the sensitivity of a recently developed whole-brain magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) sequence to cerebral pathology and disability in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and compare with measures derived from diffusion tensor imaging. Methods: Whole-brain MRSI and diffusion tensor imaging were undertaken in 13 patients and 14 age-similar healthy controls. Mean N-acetylaspartate (NAA), fractional anisotropy, and mean diffusivity were extracted from the corticospinal tract, compared between groups, and then in relation to disability in the patient group. Results: Significant reductions in NAA were found along the course of the corticospinal tracts on whole-brain MRSI. There were also significant changes in fractional anisotropy (decreased) and mean diffusivity (increased) in the patient group, but only NAA showed a significant relationship with disability (r = 0.65, p = 0.01). Conclusion: Whole-brain MRSI has potential as a quantifiable neuroimaging marker of disability in ALS. It offers renewed hope for a neuroimaging outcome measure with the potential for harmonization across multiple sites in the context of a therapeutic trial. Neurology (R) 2013;80:610-615

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据