4.7 Article

Episodic migraine and obesity and the influence of age, race, and sex

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 81, 期 15, 页码 1314-1321

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a824f7

关键词

-

资金

  1. [R01 (NIA G040282)]
  2. [R01 (NS077925)]
  3. [R03 (DK095740)]
  4. [K01 (DK083483)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the episodic migraine (EM)-obesity association and the influence of age, race, and sex on this relationship. Methods: We examined the EM-obesity association and the influence of age, race, and sex in 3,862 adult participants of both black and white race interviewed in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. EM diagnostic criteria were based on the International Classification of Headache Disorders. Body mass index was classified as underweight (<18.5 kg/m(2)), normal (18.5-24.9 kg/m(2)), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m(2)), or obese (>30 kg/m(2)). Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for EM were estimated using logistic regression. Models were stratified by age (<50/>= 50 years), race (white/black), and sex (male/female). Results: A total of 188 participants fulfilled criteria for EM. In all participants, the adjusted odds of EM were 81% greater in individuals who were obese compared with those of normal weight (OR 1.81; 95% CI: 1.27-2.57; p = 0.001), with a significant trend of increasing odds of EM with increasing obesity status from normal weight to overweight to obese (p = 0.001). In addition, stratified analyses demonstrated that the odds of EM were greater in obese as compared with normal-weight individuals who were 1) younger than 50 years of age (OR 1.86; 95% CI: 1.20-2.89; p for trend = 0.008), 2) white (OR 2.06; 95% CI: 1.41-3.01; p for trend <= 0.001), or 3) female (OR 1.95; 95% CI: 1.38-2.76; p for trend <= 0.001). Conclusion: The odds of EM are increased in those with obesity, with the strongest relationships among those younger than 50 years, white individuals, and women.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据