4.7 Review

Presymptomatic studies in ALS Rationale, challenges, and approach

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 79, 期 16, 页码 1732-1739

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31826e9b1d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Muscular Dystrophy Association [4365, 132866, 172123]
  2. Woodruff Foundation
  3. ALS
  4. NIH
  5. Food and Drug Administration
  6. Muscular Dystrophy Association
  7. ALS Association
  8. TKCIS
  9. CDC/ATSDR
  10. Alexion Pharmaceuticals
  11. Cytokinetics Inc
  12. CytRx Corporation
  13. NIH/NIA
  14. Consolidated Anti-Aging Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is now well-established that the disease process in many neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer disease, Parkinson disease, and Huntington disease, begins many years before the appearance of typical symptoms. Whether amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is also characterized by a presymptomatic period, and if so how long this period lasts, is unclear. Answers to these questions will not only inform our understanding of disease biology and potential environmental risk factors for ALS, but also the design and implementation of early therapeutic and even preventative clinical trials. Moreover, the potential impact of studying people at genetic risk for ALS, the only population in which it is currently possible to study presymptomatic disease, is underscored by recent progress in our understanding of the shared genetic basis of familial and apparently sporadic ALS. Studying presymptomatic ALS, however, has proven difficult due to the challenge in identifying an at-risk population and various logistical and ethical considerations. In this article we present the rationale for studying presymptomatic ALS, summarize the early evidence supporting the existence of a presymptomatic phase of the disease, and discuss the challenges of studying presymptomatic ALS. We also use Pre-fALS a systematic and longitudinal investigation of a cohort of individuals at genetic risk for ALS, as an example to illustrate how one might approach these challenges. Neurology (R) 2012; 79: 1732-1739

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据