4.7 Article

Adjunctive dexamethasone in adults with meningococcal meningitis

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 79, 期 15, 页码 1563-1569

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31826e2684

关键词

-

资金

  1. Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development [916.76.023, 917.11.358]
  2. Academic Medical Center
  3. European Research Council [281156]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [281156] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: We evaluated the implementation and effectiveness of adjunctive dexamethasone in adults with meningococcal meningitis. Methods: We compared 2 Dutch prospective nationwide cohort studies on community-acquired meningococcal meningitis. A total of 258 patients with CSF culture-proven meningitis were enrolled between 1998 and 2002, before routine dexamethasone therapy was introduced, and 100 patients from March 2006 to January 2011, after guidelines recommended dexamethasone. Results: Dexamethasone was administered in 43 of 258 (17%) patients in the 1998-2002 cohort and in 86 of 96 (90%) patients in the 2006-2011 cohort (p < 0.001), and was started with or before the first dose of antibiotics in 12 of 258 (5%) and 85 of 96 (89%) patients (p < 0.001). Rates of unfavorable outcome were similar between cohorts (12 of 100 [12%] vs 30 of 258 [12%]; p < 0.67), also after correction for meningococcal serogroup. The rates of hearing loss (3 of 96 [3%] vs 19 of 237 [8%]; p = 0.10) and death (4 of 100 [4%] vs 19 of 258 [7%]; p = 0.24) were lower in the 2006-2011 cohort, but this did not reach significance. The rate of arthritis was lower in patients treated with dexamethasone (32 of 258 [12%] vs 5 of 96 [5%], p = 0.046). Dexamethasone was not associated with adverse events. Conclusions: Adjunctive dexamethasone is widely prescribed for patients with meningococcal meningitis and is not associated with harm. The rate of arthritis has decreased after the implementation of dexamethasone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据