4.7 Article

Ultra-high-field imaging distinguishes MS lesions from asymptomatic white matter lesions

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 76, 期 6, 页码 534-539

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31820b7630

关键词

-

资金

  1. MRC/Multiple Sclerosis Society UK [G0700584]
  2. Bayer Schering Pharma
  3. Novartis
  4. NIH
  5. Medical Research Council UK
  6. MS Society
  7. Merck Serono
  8. Multiple Sclerosis of Great Britain
  9. Multiple Sclerosis of Northern Ireland
  10. Medical Research Council [G0901321, G0700584] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. MRC [G0700584, G0901321] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To investigate whether multiple sclerosis (MS) and non-MS white matter brain lesions can be distinguished by their appearance on 7 T T2*-weighted MRI. Methods: This was an observational study of 28 patients with MS and 17 patients with cerebral white matter lesions who did not have MS. Subjects were imaged using 7 T T2*-weighted imaging. White matter lesions were identified and analyzed for volume, location, and perivenous appearance. Results: Out of 901 lesions identified in patients with MS, 80% were perivenous. In comparison, 19% of 428 lesions identified in patients without MS had a perivenous appearance. Seven-Tesla T2*-weighted MRI reliably distinguished all patients with clinically definite MS (>40% lesions appeared perivenous) from those without clinical MS (<40% lesions appeared perivenous). Perivenous lesion appearance was more predictive of MS (odds ratio [ OR] 14, p < 0.001) than subcortical or periventricular lesion location (OR 4.5, p < 0.001, and OR 2.4, p = 0.009). Perivenous lesion appearance was observed with a similar frequency in patients with clinically isolated syndrome of demyelination and in early (gadolinium-enhancing) MS lesions. Conclusion: Perivenous lesion location on 7 T T2*-weighted imaging is predictive of the presence of demyelination. Optimization of this imaging technique at lower magnetic resonance field strengths would offer benefit for the diagnosis of MS. Neurology (R) 2011; 76: 534-539

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据