4.7 Review

Report of the task force on designing clinical trials in early (predementia) AD

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 76, 期 3, 页码 280-286

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318207b1b9

关键词

-

资金

  1. Pfizer Inc
  2. Baxter International Inc.
  3. NIH (NIA)
  4. Eisai Inc.
  5. Lundbeck Inc.
  6. Ipsen
  7. Pierre Fabre Laboratories
  8. Nestle
  9. Novartis
  10. INSERM
  11. Alzheimer's Association
  12. Academy of Healthcare Education
  13. Alpha Plus
  14. AstraZeneca
  15. Cadmus Medea Inc.
  16. Glia Scientific Communication
  17. Janssen
  18. Medical Decision Point, LLC
  19. InforMed Direct Plc
  20. MedPlan Communications Inc.
  21. Elan Corporation
  22. Eli Lilly and Company
  23. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  24. Pacific Alzheimer Research Foundation
  25. NIH
  26. Medivation, Inc.
  27. Sonexa Therapeutics, Inc.
  28. Zapaq Inc./CoMentis
  29. Inc./Athenagen
  30. Inc./Astellas Pharma Inc.
  31. Debiopharm Group
  32. GlaxoSmithKline
  33. AC Immune SA
  34. Avanir Pharmaceuticals
  35. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  36. Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma
  37. ExonHit Therapeutics
  38. Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Company
  39. Ltd./Astellas Pharma Inc.
  40. Genentech, Inc.
  41. Merck Serono
  42. Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  43. Ocera Therapeutics
  44. Prana Biotechnology Limited
  45. Schering-Plough Corp.
  46. Sepracor Inc.
  47. Suven Life Sciences Ltd.
  48. Transition Therapeutics Inc.
  49. Varinel
  50. State of Texas
  51. Elan Corporation/Wyeth
  52. NIH (NCRR)
  53. Medivation Inc.
  54. UCB
  55. Fondation pour la Recherche dans la Maladie d'Alzheimer
  56. Roche
  57. Servier
  58. Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc.
  59. Danone
  60. Alzheimer French Fondation
  61. PHRC
  62. ANR
  63. Toulouse Gerontopole
  64. La Fondation IFRAD
  65. Allergan, Inc.
  66. Lundbeck, Inc.
  67. Dr. Willmar Schwabe GmbH Co.
  68. Wyeth

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: A large number of promising candidate disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer disease (AD) continue to advance into phase II and phase III testing. However, most completed trials have failed to demonstrate efficacy, and there is growing concern that methodologic difficulties may contribute to these clinical trial failures. The optimal time to intervene with such treatments is probably in the years prior to the onset of dementia, before the neuropathology has progressed to the advanced stage corresponding to clinical dementia. Method: An international task force of individuals from academia, industry, nonprofit foundations, and regulatory agencies was convened to discuss optimal trial design in early (predementia) AD. Results: General consensus was reached on key principles involving the scope of the AD diagnosis, the selection of subjects for trials, outcome measures, and analytical methods. Conclusion: A consensus has been achieved in support of the testing of candidate treatments in the early (predementia) AD population. Neurology (R) 2011; 76:280-286

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据