4.7 Article

Early imaging predicts later cognitive impairment in primary progressive multiple sclerosis

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 74, 期 7, 页码 545-552

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181cff6a6

关键词

-

资金

  1. Multiple Sclerosis Society of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
  2. Department of Health, National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centres

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Cognitive impairment in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) is common and correlates modestly with contemporary lesion burden and brain volume. Using a cohort/case control methodology, we explore the ability of MRI abnormalities, including those in the normal-appearing brain tissue, to predict future cognitive dysfunction in PPMS. Methods: Thirty-one patients recruited into a longitudinal study within 5 years of onset of PPMS were assessed neuropsychologically on average 5.5 years later along with 31 matched healthy controls. MRI data obtained at entry into the study (lesion metrics, brain volumes, magnetization transfer ratio histogram metrics, and magnetic resonance spectroscopy metabolite concentrations) were used to predict cognitive impairment at follow-up. Results: Twenty-nine percent of patients were categorized as cognitively impaired. T2 lesion volume was the best MRI predictor of overall cognitive function and performance on tests of verbal memory and attention/speed of information processing. Low gray matter magnetization transfer ratio was the best predictor of poor performance on a further test of attention/speed of information processing and an executive function test. Low gray and white matter volumes were independent predictors of poor performance on a second test of executive function. Conclusions: MRI abnormalities observed in early primary progressive multiple sclerosis can predict cognitive impairment 5 years later. While focal damage disrupting white matter tracts appears to be the most important predictor of subsequent cognitive dysfunction, gray matter pathology also plays a role. Neurology (R) 2010; 74: 545-552

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据