4.7 Article

Vitamins B12, B6, and folic acid for cognition in older men

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 75, 期 17, 页码 1540-1547

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181f962c4

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [139123]
  2. Pfizer Inc.
  3. NHMRC
  4. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (Australia)
  5. Blackmores Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate whether supplementing older men with vitamins B-12, B-6, and folic acid improves cognitive function. Methods: The investigators recruited 299 community-representative hypertensive men 75 years and older to a randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial of folic acid, vitamin B6, and B12 supplementation vs placebo over 2 years. The primary outcome of interest was the change in the cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog). A secondary aim of the study was to determine if supplementation with vitamins decreased the risk of cognitive impairment and dementia over 8 years. Results: The groups were well-balanced for demographic and biochemical parameters. There was no difference in the ADAS-cog change from baseline to 24 months between the placebo (0.8, SD 4.0) and vitamins group (0.7, SD 3.4). The adjusted scores in the treatment groups did not differ over time (placebo 0.2 lower, z = 0.71, p = 0.478). There was a nonsignificant 28% decrease in the risk of cognitive impairment (odds ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.25-2.09) and dementia (hazard ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.29-1.78) over 8 years of follow-up. Conclusions: The daily supplementation of vitamins B-12, B-6, and folic acid does not benefit cognitive function in older men, nor does it reduce the risk of cognitive impairment or dementia. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class I evidence that vitamin supplementation with daily doses of 400 mu g of B-12, 2 mg of folic acid, and 25 mg of B-6 over 2 years does not improve cognitive function in hypertensive men aged 75 and older. Neurology (R) 2010;75:1540-1547

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据