4.7 Article

Acute ischemic stroke Imaging-guided tenecteplase treatment in an extended time window

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 72, 期 10, 页码 915-921

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000344168.05315.9d

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Tenecteplase is a modified tissue plasminogen activator with a longer half-life and higher fibrin specificity than alteplase. Methods: We conducted a prospective, nonrandomized, pilot study of 0.1 mg/kg IV tenecteplase given 3 to 6 hours after ischemic stroke onset. For a control group, we used patients contemporaneously treated with sub-3-hour 0.9 mg/kg IV alteplase following standard selection criteria. All patients underwent pretreatment and 24-hour perfusion/angiographic imaging with CT or MRI. Eligibility criteria for tenecteplase (but not alteplase) treatment included a perfusion lesion at least 20% greater than the infarct core, with an associated vessel occlusion. Primary outcomes, assessed blind to treatment group, were reperfusion (reduction in baseline-24-hour mean transit time lesion) and major vessel recanalization. Results: Fifteen patients received tenecteplase, and 35 patients received alteplase. The tenecteplase group had greater reperfusion (mean 74% vs 44% in the alteplase group, p = 0.01) and major vessel recanalization (10/15 tenecteplase vs 7/29 alteplase, p = 0.01). Despite later time to treatment, more tenecteplase patients (10/15 vs 7/35 alteplase, p = 0.001) had major neurologic improvement at 24 hours (NIH Stroke Scale reduction >= 8). Four of the alteplase patients and none of the tenecteplase patients had parenchymal hematoma at 24 hours. Conclusions: Tenecteplase 0.1 mg/kg, using advanced imaging guidance in an extended time window, may have significant biologic efficacy in acute ischemic stroke. The imaging selection differences between the tenecteplase and alteplase groups prevent a conclusive efficacy comparison. Nonetheless, these results lend support for randomized trials comparing tenecteplase with alteplase, preferably incorporating penumbral/angiographic imaging selection. Neurology (R) 2009; 72: 915-921

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据