4.7 Article

Dopamine agonists in 6-pyruvoyl tetrahydropterin synthase deficiency

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 73, 期 8, 页码 633-637

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b38983

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To report the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of the dopamine agonist pramipexole in a series of 5 patients affected by inherited 6-pyruvoyl tetrahydropterin synthase (PTPS) deficiency and needing L-3,4 dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-dopa) therapy. Methods: Patients included 4 males and 1 female with ages ranging from 2 to 26 years. Their medication included tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), 5-hydroxytryptophan, L-dopa, carbidopa, selegiline, and entacapone. All experienced residual symptoms of dopamine deficiency, movement and behavioral disability, and complications of L-dopa therapy, associated with fluctuating hyperprolactinemia. Patients had full assessment of clinical and biochemical condition, including evaluation by an adapted Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and measurement of plasma prolactin (PRL) and catecholamines, before and after a 6-week trial with pramipexole. Pramipexole was administered twice daily as an adjunct to L-dopa therapy in dosages upwardly titrated, with a concurrent reduction of L-dopa dosage. Clinical follow-up went on for 1 year. Results: Pramipexole was well tolerated by all patients, with marked improvement and stabilization of their clinical picture. The mean improvement on the total UPDRS score was 43% (range 33.3%-55.6%) from baseline. Diurnal profiles of plasma PRL normalized and plasma catecholamine levels lasted unchanged. The daily administrations of L-dopa were curtailed from 3 or 4 to 2, and the L-dopa dosage was reduced up to 40%. Conclusions: The addition of pramipexole to the treatment of 6-pyruvoyl tetrahydropterin synthase deficiency improves the results of L-3,4 dihydroxyphenylalanine therapy. Similar benefits may be expected in other forms of inherited tetrahydrobiopterin deficiency. Neurology (R) 2009; 73: 633-637

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据