4.7 Article

Mitoxantrone and cytotoxic drugs' mechanisms of action

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 74, 期 1, 页码 S41-S46

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c97f5a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Teva Neuroscience
  2. Acorda Therapeutics
  3. Barrow Neurological Foundation
  4. BioMS Medical
  5. Consortium of MS Centers
  6. Daiichi Sankyo
  7. Eli Lilly and Company
  8. Genentech
  9. Genzyme Corporation
  10. Merck Serono SA
  11. National Multiple Sclerosis Society
  12. Novartis
  13. Ono Pharmaceuticals
  14. PDL BioPharma
  15. Pfizer
  16. Rocky Mountain Multiple Sclerosis Society
  17. Sanofi-aventis
  18. Teva Pharmaceuticals
  19. Translational Genomics Research Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evidence has suggested that early, aggressive intervention may improve both short- and long-term outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Cytotoxic agents may offer advantages in this setting, particularly when used as an induction or add-on therapy with immunomodulators. Immunosuppression is the mechanism of action common to all cytotoxic drugs; individual subtleties in immunoregulatory actions are likely of minor importance. In the United States, mitoxantrone is currently the only cytotoxic agent approved for the treatment of MS (secondary-progressive, progressive-relapsing, and worsening relapsing-remitting forms). Therapies in phase III development include cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, cladribine, and teriflunomide. All these drugs have exhibited efficacy in controlled clinical trials, although the degree of benefit with respect to MRI and clinical endpoints has varied both within and among the various agents. Further investigations are needed to determine whether cytotoxic drugs represent a substantial improvement over treatments that have a more targeted impact on the immune system. NEUROLOGY 2010;74(Suppl 1):S41-S46

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据