4.7 Article

Augmented neural activity during executive control processing following diffuse axonal injury

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 71, 期 11, 页码 812-818

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000325640.18235.1c

关键词

-

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [HD42385-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Deficits in working memory are commonly observed after traumatic brain injury (TBI), with executive control processes preferentially impacted relative to storage and rehearsal. Previous activation functional neuroimaging investigations of working memory in patients with TBI have reported altered functional recruitment, but methodologic issues including sample heterogeneity (e. g., variability in injury mechanism, severity, neuropathology or chronicity), underspecified definitions of working memory, and behavioral differences between TBI and control groups have hindered interpretation of these changes. Methods: Executive control processing in working memory was explicitly engaged during fMRI in a sample of carefully selected chronic-stage, moderate-to-severe TBI patients with diffuse axonal injury (DAI) but without focal lesions. Results: Despite equivalent task performance, we observed a pattern of greater recruitment of interhemispheric and intrahemispheric regions of prefrontal cortex (PFC) and posterior cortices in our DAI sample. Enhanced activations were recorded in the left dorsolateral PFC (middle frontal gyrus), right ventrolateral PFC (inferior frontal gyrus), bilateral posterior parietal cortices, and left temporo-occipital junction. Region-of-interest analyses confirmed that these effects were robust across individual patients and could not be attributed to load factors or slowed speed of processing. Conclusions: Augmented functional recruitment in the context of normal behavioral performance may be a neural marker of capacity or efficiency limits that can affect functional outcome after traumatic brain injury with diffuse injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据