4.7 Article

Tau forms in CSF as a reliable biomarker for progressive supranuclear palsy

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 71, 期 22, 页码 1796-1803

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000335941.68602.39

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: In CSF, extended (55 kDa) and truncated (33 kDa) tau forms have been previously recognized, and the tau 33 kDa/55 kDa ratio has been found significantly reduced in progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) vs in other neurodegenerative disorders. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of the CSF tau form ratio as a biomarker of PSP and to correlate the structural anatomic changes as measured by means of voxel-based morphometry (VBM) to CSF tau form ratio decrease. Methods: A total of 166 subjects were included in the study (21 PSP, 20 corticobasal degeneration syndrome, 44 frontotemporal dementia, 29 Alzheimer disease, 10 Parkinson disease, 15 dementia with Lewy bodies, and 27 individuals without any neurodegenerative disorder). Each patient underwent a standardized clinical and neuropsychological evaluation. In CSF, a semiquantitative immunoprecipitation was developed to evaluate CSF tau 33 kDa/55 kDa ratio. MRI assessment and VBM analysis was carried out. Results: Tau form ratio was significantly reduced in patients with PSP (0.504 +/- 0.284) when compared to age-matched controls (0.989 +/- 0.343), and to patients with other neurodegenerative conditions (range = 0.899-1.215). The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic analysis in PSP vs other subgroups ranged from 0.863 to 0.937 (PSP vs others, AUC = 0.897, p < 0.0001). VBM study showed that CSF tau form ratio decrease correlated significantly with brainstem atrophy. Conclusions: Truncated tau production, which selectively affects brainstem neuron susceptibility, can be considered a specific and reliable marker for PSP. Tau form ratio was the lowest in progressive supranuclear palsy with no overlap with any other neurodegenerative illness. Neurology (R) 2008; 71:1796-1803

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据