4.2 Article

Effect of minocycline on carotid atherosclerotic plaques

期刊

NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 35, 期 8, 页码 844-850

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1179/1743132813Y.0000000223

关键词

Atherosclerosis; Plaque; CD147; MMP-9; Minocycline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To investigate whether minocycline could attenuate the expression of extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer (CD147) and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 and enhance stability of atherosclerotic plaques. Methods: Twenty-four New Zealand rabbits underwent balloon-induced endothelial injury of right carotid artery and were fed 1% cholesterol diet for 16 weeks. From week 12 to week 16, the animals were intervened with minocycline (2.5 mg kg(-1) d(-1), group A), atorvastatin (2.5 mg kg(-1) d(-1), group B) or were not treated with drugs (group C). After 16 weeks, all the rabbits were sacrificed by Chinese Russell's viper venom and histamine injection, then serum and right common carotid arteries were collected for biochemical, histological, and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis. Results: A rabbit model of atherosclerotic vulnerable plaques was established. Minocycline significantly increased the thickness of the plaque fibrous caps and decreased the positive staining area of macrophages in group A. When compared with group C, CD147, and MMP-9 expression in both mRNA and protein level were remarkably reduced in group A and B (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between group A and B. Serum TC and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were decreased in the Atorvastatin group (P < 0.05), while minocycline had no obvious influence on the serum lipid levels. The incidence of plaque ruptures in group A (14.3%) and group B (14.3%) was lower than that in group C (66.7%, P < 0.05). Conclusions: Minocycline intervention significantly reduced the activity of CD147, MMP in plaque and histologically enhanced plaque stabilization. Minocycline was equally effective as Atorvastatin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据