4.3 Article

PRoNTo: Pattern Recognition for Neuroimaging Toolbox

期刊

NEUROINFORMATICS
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 319-337

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12021-013-9178-1

关键词

Neuroimaging software; Pattern recognition; Machine learning; Image analysis; MVPA

资金

  1. Department of Computer Science, University College London
  2. Wellcome Trust [WT086565/Z/08/Z]
  3. PASCAL2
  4. HARVEST programme
  5. Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique-FNRS, Belgium
  6. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, Portugal
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation [PP00P2-123438]
  8. Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM) of the EPFL
  9. University and Hospital of Lausanne
  10. University and Hospital Geneva
  11. King's College London Centre of Excellence in Medical Engineering
  12. Wellcome Trust
  13. EPSRC [WT088641/Z/09/Z]
  14. Marie Curie Actions [299500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the past years, mass univariate statistical analyses of neuroimaging data have been complemented by the use of multivariate pattern analyses, especially based on machine learning models. While these allow an increased sensitivity for the detection of spatially distributed effects compared to univariate techniques, they lack an established and accessible software framework. The goal of this work was to build a toolbox comprising all the necessary functionalities for multivariate analyses of neuroimaging data, based on machine learning models. The Pattern Recognition for Neuroimaging Toolbox (PRoNTo) is open-source, cross-platform, MATLAB-based and SPM compatible, therefore being suitable for both cognitive and clinical neuroscience research. In addition, it is designed to facilitate novel contributions from developers, aiming to improve the interaction between the neuroimaging and machine learning communities. Here, we introduce PRoNTo by presenting examples of possible research questions that can be addressed with the machine learning framework implemented in PRoNTo, and cannot be easily investigated with mass univariate statistical analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据