4.0 Article

Does Lipoic Acid Consumption Affect the Cytokine Profile in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Double-Blind, PlaceboControlled, Randomized Clinical Trial

期刊

NEUROIMMUNOMODULATION
卷 21, 期 6, 页码 291-296

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000356145

关键词

Lipoic acid; Multiple sclerosis; Cytokine profile; Inflammatory factors

资金

  1. Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran [948]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: A limited amount of data exists regarding the effect of lipoic acid (LA), an oral antioxidant supplement, on cytokine profiles among multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Objective: We aimed to assess the effect of daily consumption of LA on the cytokine profiles in MS patients. Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, 52 relapsing-remitting MS patients with an age range of 18 50 years were recruited into 2 groups: LA consumption (1,200 mg/day) or placebo. Patients followed their prescribed supplements for 12 weeks. Fasting blood samples for cytokine profile measurement were collected at baseline and after the intervention. Anthropometric parameters were measured based on the standard guidelines. Results: INF-gamma, ICAM-1, TGF-beta and IL-4 were significantly reduced in the LA group compared to the placebo group [(INF-gamma: 0.82 +/- 0.2 vs. 0.2 +/- 0.2 pg/ml, p < 0.0001), (ICAM-1: 20.2 +/- 9.4 vs. 8 +/- 10 ng/ ml, p = 0.0001), (TGF-beta: 103.1 +/- 20.2 vs. 54.9 +/- 26 ng/ml, p < 0.0001) and (IL-4: 0.1 +/- 0.1 vs. 1.02 +/- 1.7 ng/ml, p = 0.0112)]. No significant changes in TNF-alpha, IL-6, EDSS and MMP-9 were found between the LA and placebo groups (p = 0.6, p = 0.8, p = 0.09 and p = 0.8, respectively). Conclusion: The results suggested that consumption of 1,200 mg LA per day beneficially affects several inflammatory cytokines including INF-gamma, ICAM-1 TGF-beta and IL-4. Further investigations are needed to verify the beneficial role of LA on other cytokine profiles among MS patients. (C) 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据