4.0 Article

Severe Disability in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Is Associated with Profound Changes in the Regulation of Leptin Secretion

期刊

NEUROIMMUNOMODULATION
卷 20, 期 6, 页码 341-347

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000353567

关键词

Multiple sclerosis; Disability; Body mass index; Leptin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Experimental evidences indicate that leptin is involved in the neuroinflammatory process sustaining multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the relationship between leptin and body fat, as assessed by body mass index (BMI), in MS was not previously evaluated. It was the aim of this study to compare serum leptin levels between patients with MS and healthy controls and to evaluate the possible relationship between circulating leptin levels and disease severity. Patients and Methods: Eighty-four MS patients and 57 sex-matched healthy volunteers were enrolled. Serum leptin levels were measured in all patients and controls. MS patients were stratified in 3 groups according to their degree of disability as assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Patients were classified as having low (33 patients with an EDSS score <1.5), intermediate (28 patients with an EDSS score from 2 to 3) and high disability (23 patients with an EDSS score >= 3.5). Results: No significant differences in serum leptin levels and BMI were observed between patients and controls. In patients with MS, serum leptin levels were significantly correlated with BMI in those patients with low (R-2 = 0.363; p < 0.001) and intermediate disability (R-2 = 0.408; p < 0.001), but not in patients with a higher disability score (R-2 = 0.064; p = 0.256). Conclusion: BMI, the major determinant of leptin level in physiological conditions, has a minor role in determining the serum levels of leptin in MS patients with a high EDSS score. Future longitudinal studies will be required in order to provide further insights into the regulation of leptin secretion in patients with MS. Copyright (C) 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据