4.7 Article

Automated quality control for within and between studies diffusion MRI data using a non-parametric framework for movement and distortion correction

期刊

NEUROIMAGE
卷 184, 期 -, 页码 801-812

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.073

关键词

Diffusion MRI; Quality control; Movement; Susceptibility; Eddy current

资金

  1. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013/ERC) [319456]
  2. EPSRC UK [EP/L023067]
  3. UK Medical Research Council [MR/L009013/1]
  4. Wellcome-Trust Strategic Award [098369/Z/12/Z]
  5. NIH Human Connectome Project [1U01MH109589-01, 1U01AG052564-01]
  6. Wellcome Trust [203139/Z/16/Z]
  7. 16 NIH Institutes [1U54MH091657]
  8. NIH Blueprint for Neuroscience Research
  9. McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience at Washington University
  10. UK Medical Research Council
  11. Wellcome Trust via UK Biobank
  12. HDH Wills 1965 Charitable Trust [1117747]
  13. Lifelong Health and Wellbeing Programme Grant: Predicting MRI abnormalities with longitudinal data of the Whitehall II Substudy (UK Medical Research Council) [G1001354]
  14. EPSRC [EP/L023067/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  15. MRC [MR/L009013/1, MR/K013351/1, G1001354] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diffusion MRI data can be affected by hardware and subject-related artefacts that can adversely affect downstream analyses. Therefore, automated quality control (QC) is of great importance, especially in large population studies where visual QC is not practical. In this work, we introduce an automated diffusion MRI QC framework for single subject and group studies. The QC is based on a comprehensive, non-parametric approach for movement and distortion correction: FSL EDDY, which allows us to extract a rich set of QC metrics that are both sensitive and specific to different types of artefacts. Two different tools are presented: QUAD (QUality Assessment for DMRI), for single subject QC and SQUAD (Study-wise QUality Assessment for DMRI), which is designed to enable group QC and facilitate cross-studies harmonisation efforts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据