4.7 Article

Low-frequency direct cortical stimulation of left superior frontal gyrus enhances working memory performance

期刊

NEUROIMAGE
卷 184, 期 -, 页码 697-706

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.064

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health [R01MH101547, R21MH105557]
  2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health [R21NS094988]
  3. UNC School of Medicine
  4. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), National Institutes of Health [UL1TR001111]
  5. Helen Lyng White Postdoctoral Fellowship
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation [P300PA_164693, P3P3PA_171525]
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [P3P3PA_171525, P300PA_164693] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The neural substrates of working memory are spread across prefrontal, parietal and cingulate cortices and are thought to be coordinated through low frequency cortical oscillations in the theta (3-8 Hz) and alpha (8-12 Hz) frequency bands. While the functional role of many subregions have been elucidated using neuroimaging studies, the role of superior frontal gyrus (SFG) is not yet clear. Here, we combined electrocorticography and direct cortical stimulation in three patients implanted with subdural electrodes to assess if superior frontal gyrus is indeed involved in working memory. We found left SFG exhibited task-related modulation of oscillations in the theta and alpha frequency bands specifically during the encoding epoch. Stimulation at the frequency matched to the endogenous oscillations resulted in reduced reaction times in all three participants. Our results provide evidence for SFG playing a functional role in working memory and suggest that SFG may coordinate working memory through low-frequency oscillations thus bolstering the feasibility of using intracranial electric stimulation for restoring cognitive function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据