4.7 Article

Differential functional benefits of ultra highfield MR systems within the language network

期刊

NEUROIMAGE
卷 103, 期 -, 页码 163-170

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.036

关键词

-

资金

  1. Vienna Spots of Excellence Program of the Centre of Innovation and Technology, City of Vienna (ZIT) [FA102A001]
  2. University of Vienna
  3. Medical University of Vienna
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [KLI264]
  5. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [KLI 264] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [KLI264] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several investigations have shown limitations of fMRI reliability with the current standard field strengths. Improvement is expected from ultra highfield systems but studies on possible benefits for cognitive networks are lacking. Here we provide an initial investigation on a prominent and clinically highly-relevant cognitive function: language processing in individual brains. 26 patients evaluated for presurgical language localization were investigated with a standardized overt language fMRI paradigm on both 3 T and 7 T MR scanners. During data acquisition and analysis we made particular efforts to minimize effects not related to static magnetic field strength differences. Six measures relevant for functional activation showed a large dissociation between essential language network nodes: although in Wernicke's area 5/6 measures indicated a benefit of ultra highfield, in Broca's area no comparison was significant. The most important reason for this discrepancy was identified as being an increase in susceptibility-related artifacts in inferior frontal brain areas at ultra high field. We conclude that functional UHF benefits are evident, however these depend crucially on the brain region investigated and the ability to control local artifacts. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据