4.7 Article

Wedge MUSIC: A novel approach to examine experimental differences of brain source connectivity patterns from EEG/MEG data

期刊

NEUROIMAGE
卷 101, 期 -, 页码 610-624

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.011

关键词

Electroencephalography; Magnetoencephalography; Functional connectivity; Source localization; Imaginary part of coherency; Volume conduction; Class differences

资金

  1. EU [ERC-2010-AdG-269716]
  2. DFG [SFB 936/A3]
  3. BMBF [031A130]
  4. EU project 'Extending sensorimotor contingencies to cognition - eSMCs' [IST-270212]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We introduce a novel method to estimate bivariate synchronization, i.e. interacting brain sources at a specific frequency or band, from MEG or EEG data robust to artifacts of volume conduction. The data driven calculation is solely based on the imaginary part of the cross-spectrumas opposed to the imaginary part of coherency. In principle, the method quantifies how strong a synchronization between a distinct pair of brain sources is present in the data. As an input of the method all pairs of pre-defined locations inside the brain can be used which is computationally exhaustive. In contrast to that, reference sources can be used that have been identified by any source reconstruction technique in a prior analysis step. We introduce different variants of the method and evaluate the performance in simulations. As a particular advantage of the proposed methodology, we demonstrate that the novel approach is capable of investigating differences in brain source interactions between experimental conditions or with respect to a certain baseline. For measured data, we first show the application on resting state MEG data where we find locally synchronized sources in the motor-cortex based on the sensorimotor idle rhythms. Finally, we show an example on EEG motor imagery data where we contrast hand and foot movements. Here, we also find local interactions in the expected brain areas. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据