4.7 Article

Neuroinflammation in healthy aging: A PET study using a novel Translocator Protein 18 kDa (TSPO) radioligand, [18F]-FEPPA

期刊

NEUROIMAGE
卷 84, 期 -, 页码 868-875

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.021

关键词

Neuroinflammation; PET imaging; Microglia activation; TSPO; Healthy aging; [F-18]-FEPPA

资金

  1. Scottish Grant Charitable Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One of the cellular markers of neuroinflammation is increased microglia activation, characterized by overexpression of mitochondrial 18 kDa Translocator Protein (TSPO). TSPO expression can be quantified in-vivo using the positron emission tomography (PET) radioligand [F-18]-FEPPA. This study examined microglial activation as measured with [F-18]-FEPPA PET across the adult lifespan in a group of healthy volunteers. We performed genotyping for the rs6971 TS.PO gene polymorphism to control for the known variability in binding affinity. Thirty-three healthy volunteers (age range: 19-82 years; 22 high affinity binders (HAB), 11 mixed affinity binders (MAB)) underwent [F-18]-FEPPA PET scans, acquired on the High Resolution Research Tomograph (HRRT) and analyzed using a 2-tissue compartment model. Regression analyses were performed to examine the effect of age adjusting for genetic status on [F-18]-FEPPA total distribution volumes (V-T) in the hippocampus, temporal, and prefrontal cortex. We found no significant effect of age on [F-18]-FEPPA V-T (F (1,30) = 0.918; p = 0.346), and a significant effect of genetic polymorphism (F (1,30) = 8.767; p = 0.006). This is the first in-vivo study to evaluate age-related changes in TSPO binding, using the new generation TSPO radioligands. Increased neuroinflammation, as measured with [F-18]-FEPPA PET was not associated with normal aging, suggesting that healthy elderly individuals may serve as useful benchmark against patients with neurodegenerative disorders where neuroinflammation may be present. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据