4.7 Article

Electrophysiological markers of biological motion and human form recognition

期刊

NEUROIMAGE
卷 84, 期 -, 页码 854-867

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.026

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC)
  2. Canada Research Chairs Program
  3. NSERC Postgraduate Scholarship
  4. NSERC Summer Undergraduate Research Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Current models suggest that human form and motion information are initially processed through separate pathways, then integrated in action perception. Testing such a sequential model requires techniques with high temporal resolution. Prior work demonstrated sensitivity of a posterior temporal event-related potential (ERP) effect the N2 to biological motion, but did not test whether the N2 indexes biological motion perception specifically, or human form/action perception more generally. We recorded ERPs while participants viewed stimuli across 3 blocks: (1) static (non-moving) point-light displays of humans performing actions; (2) static stick figures with clear forms; and (3) point-light biological motion. A similar sequence of ERP components was elicited by human forms in all blocks (stationary and moving), and reliably discriminated between human and scrambled forms. The N2 showed similar scalp distribution and sensitivity to stimulus manipulations for both stick figures and biological motion, suggesting that it indexes integration of form and motion information, rather than biological motion perception exclusively and that form and motion information are therefore integrated by approximately 200 ms. We identified a component subsequent to the N2, which we label the medial parietal positivity/ ventral-anterior negativity (MPP/VAN), that was also sensitive to both human form and motion information. We propose that the MPP/VAN reflects higher-order human action recognition that occurs subsequent to the integration of form and motion information reflected by the N2. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据