4.1 Article

SEDIMENTOLOGY AND PALAEONTOLOGY OF THE BEAUFORT GROUP IN THE FREE STATE PROVINCE SUPPORTS A RECIPROCAL FORELAND BASIN MODEL FOR THE KAROO SUPERGROUP, SOUTH AFRICA

期刊

SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY
卷 118, 期 4, 页码 355-372

出版社

GEOLOGICAL SOC SOUTH AFRICA
DOI: 10.2113/gssajg.118.4.355

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Council for Geoscience
  2. Palaeontological Scientific Trust (PAST) and its Scatterlings of Africa programmes
  3. National Research Foundation (NRF)
  4. DST/NRF Centre of Excellence in Palaeosciences (CoE in Palaeosciences)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Various different models have been proposed for the style of fill of the Karoo Basin in South Africa. One of these proposes that the Karoo Basin behaved as a partitioned entity, with reciprocal fills on either side of a hinge line separating proximal and distal facies. Detailed sedimentological, palaeontological, stratigraphic and geophysical data for the Beaufort Group in the central Free State lends credence to this model. In the study area fossils assignable to the Dicynodon, Lystrosaurus and Cynognathus assemblage zones occur in the Balfour, Katberg and Burgersdorp formations respectively. This data shows that certain parts of the Beaufort Group stratigraphic succession that are present in the southern part of the Karoo Basin, are absent in the central Free State, indicating either a depositional hiatus or a period of erosion at the beginning and the end of Lystrosaurus Assemblage Zone, as well as the end of Cynognathus Assemblage Zone times. During these depositional hiatuses or periods of erosion, deposition or preservation of the rock record was restricted to the proximal sector (south of the hinge line). Study of the geophysical data has also allowed for the definition of a basement high north-east of Thaba Nchu, which probably accounts for the provenance of the informally named Musgrave unit (upper Balfour Formation), which also has an anomalous south-westerly palaeocurrent direction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据