4.7 Review

Neuroimaging in aphasia treatment research: Quantifying brain lesions after stroke

期刊

NEUROIMAGE
卷 73, 期 -, 页码 208-214

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.044

关键词

Structural anatomy; Language recovery; Stroke; Aphasia; Brain lesions

资金

  1. School of Communication
  2. Northwestern University
  3. UK Medical Research Council [G0701888]
  4. Australian Research Council [DP0880556]
  5. National Health and Medical Research Council
  6. National Institutes of Health, Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders [R01DCOI948-17, R01DC007213, R01DC05375]
  7. MRC [G0701888] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Medical Research Council [G0701888] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Australian Research Council [DP0880556] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New structural and functional neuroimaging methods continue to rapidly develop, offering promising tools for cognitive neuroscientists. In the last 20 years, advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques have provided invaluable insights into how language is represented and processed in the brain and how it can be disrupted by damage to, or dysfunction of, various parts of the brain. Current functional MRI (fMRI) approaches have also allowed researchers to purposefully investigate how individuals recover language after stroke. This paper presents recommendations for quantification of brain lesions derived from discussions among international researchers at the Neuroimaging in Aphasia Treatment Research Workshop held at Northwestern University (Evanston, Illinois, USA). Methods for detailing and characterizing the brain damage that can influence results of fMRI studies in chronic aphasic stroke patients are discussed. Moreover, we aimed to provide the reader with a set of general practical guidelines and references to facilitate choosing adequate structural imaging strategies that facilitate fMRI studies in aphasia treatment research. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据