4.7 Article

Neural evidence for a 3-state model of visual short-term memory

期刊

NEUROIMAGE
卷 74, 期 -, 页码 1-11

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.019

关键词

Working memory; Attention; Long-term memory; PFC; Hippocampus

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [BCS 0822748]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [MH60655]
  3. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [NS082069]
  4. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0822748] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [0822748] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent research has suggested that short-term memory (STM) can be partitioned into three distinct states. By this model, a single item is held in the focus of attention making it available for immediate processing (focus of attention), a capacity-limited set of additional items is actively maintained for future processing (direct access region), and other recently presented information is passively active, but can nevertheless influence ongoing cognition (activated portion of long-term memory). While there is both behavioral and neural support for this 3-state model in verbal STM, it is unclear whether the model generalizes to non-verbal STM. Here, we tested a 3-state model of visual STM using fMRI. We found a triple dissociation of regions involved in the access of each hypothesized state. The inferior parietal cortex mediated access to the focus of attention, the medial temporal lobe (MTL) including the hippocampus mediated access to the direct access region, and the left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) mediated access to the activated portion of long-term memory. Direct comparison with previously collected verbal STM data revealed overlapping neural activations involved in the access of each state across different forms of content suggesting that mechanisms of access are domain general. These data support a 3-state model of STM. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据