4.7 Article

k-space and q-space: Combining ultra-high spatial and angular resolution in diffusion imaging using ZOOPPA at 7 T

期刊

NEUROIMAGE
卷 60, 期 2, 页码 967-978

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.081

关键词

Diffusion MRI; Fiber-tracking; Ultra-high field MRI; Parallel imaging; Zoomed imaging

资金

  1. Siemens Healthcare in Erlangen
  2. CONNECT of the European Union
  3. Research Center Magnetic Resonance Bavaria (MRB) in Wurzburg

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is ongoing debate whether using a higher spatial resolution (sampling k-space) or a higher angular resolution (sampling q-space angles) is the better way to improve diffusion MRI (dMRI) based tractography results in living humans. In both cases, the limiting factor is the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), due to the restricted acquisition time. One possible way to increase the spatial resolution without sacrificing either SNR or angular resolution is to move to a higher magnetic field strength. Nevertheless, dMRI has not been the preferred application for ultra-high field strength (7 T). This is because single-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI) has been the method of choice for human in vivo dMRI. EPI faces several challenges related to the use of a high resolution at high field strength, for example, distortions and image blurring. These problems can easily compromise the expected SNR gain with field strength. In the current study, we introduce an adapted EPI sequence in conjunction with a combination of ZOOmed imaging and Partially Parallel Acquisition (ZOOPPA). We demonstrate that the method can produce high quality diffusion-weighted images with high spatial and angular resolution at 7 T. We provide examples of in vivo human dMRI with isotropic resolutions of 1 mm and 800 mu m. These data sets are particularly suitable for resolving complex and subtle fiber architectures, including fiber crossings in the white matter, anisotropy in the cortex and fibers entering the cortex. (c) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据