4.7 Article

Effects of network resolution on topological properties of human neocortex

期刊

NEUROIMAGE
卷 59, 期 4, 页码 3522-3532

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.086

关键词

Cortical networks; Structural connectivity; Cortical scale; Small-world properties; Cortical thickness

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [SAF2008-03300, SAF2011-25463]
  2. Regional Ministry of Innovation, Science and Enterprise, Junta de Andalucia [P09-CTS-4604]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graph theoretical analyses applied to neuroimaging datasets have provided valuable insights into the large-scale anatomical organization of the human neocortex. Most of these studies were performed with different cortical scales leading to cortical networks with different levels of small-world organization. The present study investigates how resolution of thickness-based cortical scales impacts on topological properties of human anatomical cortical networks. To this end, we designed a novel approach aimed at determining the best trade-off between small-world attributes of anatomical cortical networks and the number of cortical regions included in the scale. Results revealed that schemes comprising 540-599 regions (surface areas spanning between 250 and 275 mm(2)) at sparsities below 10% showed a superior balance between small-world organization and the size of the cortical scale employed. Furthermore, we found that the cortical scale representing the best trade-off (599 regions) was more resilient to targeted attacks than atlas-based schemes (Desikan-Killiany atlas, 66 regions) and, most importantly, it did not differ that much from the finest cortical scale tested in the present study (1494 regions). In summary, our study confirms that topological organization of anatomical cortical networks varies with both sparsity and resolution of cortical scale, and it further provides a novel methodological framework aimed at identifying cortical schemes that maximize small-worldness with the lowest scale resolution possible. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据