4.7 Article

The danger of systematic bias in group-level FMRI-lag-based causality estimation

期刊

NEUROIMAGE
卷 59, 期 2, 页码 1228-1229

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.015

关键词

Granger causality; FMRI; Haemodynamic lag

资金

  1. MRC [G0900908, G0700399] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G0700399, G0900908] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [G0900908, G0700399] Funding Source: Medline
  4. Wellcome Trust [091593, 088130] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Schippers, Renken and Keysers (NeuroImage, 2011) present a simulation of multi-subject lag-based causality estimation. We fully agree that single-subject evaluations (e.g., Smith et al., 2011) need to be revisited in the context of multi-subject studies, and Schippers' paper is a good example, including detailed multi-level simulation and cross-subject statistical modelling. The authors conclude that the average chance to find a significant Granger causality effect when no actual influence is present in the data stays well below the p-level imposed on the second level statistics and that when the analyses reveal a significant directed influence, this direction was accurate in the vast majority of the cases. Unfortunately, we believe that the general meaning that may be taken from these statements is not supported by the paper's results, as there may in reality be a systematic (group-average) difference in haemodynamic delay between two brain areas. While many statements in the paper (e.g., the final two sentences) do refer to this problem, we fear that the overriding message that many readers may take from the paper could cause misunderstanding. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据