4.7 Article

Interactions between different EEG frequency bands and their effect on alpha-fMRI correlations

期刊

NEUROIMAGE
卷 47, 期 1, 页码 69-76

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.029

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In EEG/fMRI correlation studies it is common to consider the fMRI BOLD as filtered version of the EEG alpha power. Here the question is addressed whether other EEG frequency components may affect the correlation between alpha and BOLD. This was done comparing the statistical parametric maps (SPMs) of three different filter models wherein either the free or the standard hemodynamic response functions (HRF) were used in combination with the full spectral bandwidth of the EEG. EEG and fMRI were co-registered in a 30 min resting state condition in 15 healthy young subjects. Power variations in the delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma bands were extracted from the EEG and used as regressors in a general linear model. Statistical parametric maps (SPMs) were computed using three different filter models, wherein either the free or the standard hemodynamic response functions (HRF) were used in combination with the full spectral bandwidth of the EEG. Results show that the SPMs of different EEG frequency bands, when significant, are very similar to that of the alpha rhythm. This is true in particular for the beta band, despite the fact that the alpha harmonics were discarded. It is shown that inclusion of EEG frequency bands as confounder in the fMRI-alpha Correlation model has a large effect on the resulting SPM, in particular when for each frequency band the HRF is extracted from the data. We conclude that power fluctuations of different EEG frequency bands are mutually highly correlated, and that a multi frequency model is required to extract the SPM of the frequency of interest from EEG/fMRI data. When no constraints are put on the shapes of the HRFs of the nuisance frequencies, the correlation model looses so much statistical power that no correlations can be detected. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据