4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Morphological alterations in the congenital blind based on the analysis of cortical thickness and surface area

期刊

NEUROIMAGE
卷 47, 期 1, 页码 98-106

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.076

关键词

Blind; Cortical surface area; Cortical thickness; Cross-modal plasticity; Visual cortex

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To explore the morphological aspects of the functional reorganization of the blind's visual cortex, we analyzed the regional cortical thickness and cortical Surface area in the congenitally blind subjects (CB) compared to the late-onset blind (LB) and sighted controls (SC). Cortical thickness was calculated from high-resolution T1-weighted magnetic resonance images of 21 young CB (blind from birth, mean age = 27.1 yr), 12 LB, and 35 young SC. Analysis of covariance of cortical layer thickness with global thickness, age, and gender as covariates was done node-by-node on the entire cortical Surface. Further analysis of mean thickness and surface area was performed for 33 automatically parceled cortical regions. Voxel-based morphometry was also conducted to compare results with cortical thickness and surface area. We found increased cortical thickness in the regions involved in vision and eye movement, such as the pericalcarine sulcus, cingulate cortex, and right frontal eye field, but cortical thinning in the left somatosensory cortex and right auditory cortex of CB compared to SC. CB had significantly reduced surface extent in the primary and associated visual areas, which explains volumetric atrophies in the visual cortex of CB despite increased cortical thickness. Conversely, LB tended to have cortical thinning in the primary Visual cortex with a slight or no significant reduction in the surface extent. These morphological alterations in CB may indicate cortical reorganization at the visual Cortex in connection with other sensory cortices. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据