4.7 Article

Validation of a fully automated 3D hippocampal segmentation method using subjects with Alzheimer's disease mild cognitive impairment, and elderly controls

期刊

NEUROIMAGE
卷 43, 期 1, 页码 59-68

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.07.003

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [U01 AG024904]
  2. National Institute of Aging
  3. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB)
  4. Foundation for the National Institutes of Health
  5. Pfizer Inc.
  6. Wyeth Research
  7. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  8. Eli Lilly and Company
  9. GlaxoSmithKline
  10. Merck Co. Inc.
  11. AstraZeneca AB
  12. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
  13. Alzheimer's Association
  14. Eisai Global Clinical Development
  15. Elan Corporation plc
  16. Forest Laboratories
  17. Institute for the Study of Aging (ISOA)
  18. U.S. Food and Drug Administration
  19. NIA
  20. NIBIB
  21. National Library of Medicine
  22. National Center for Research Resources [AG016570, EB01651, LM05639, RR019771]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We introduce a new method for brain MRI segmentation, called the auto context model (ACM), to segment the hippocampus automatically in 3D T1-weighted structural brain MRI Scans Of Subjects from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). In a training phase, our algorithm used 21 hand-labeled segmentations to learn a classification rule for hippocampal versus non-hippocampal regions using a modified AdaBoost method, based on similar to 18,000 features (image intensity, position, image curvatures, image gradients, tissue classification maps of gray/white matter and CSF, and mean, standard deviation, and Haar filters of size 1 x 1 x 1 to 7 x 7 x 7). We linearly registered all brains to a standard template to devise a basic shape prior to capture the global shape of the hippocampus, defined as the pointwise summation of all the training masks. We also included curvature, gradient, mean, standard deviation, and Haar filters of the shape prior and the tissue classified images as features. During each iteration of ACM - our extension of AdaBoost the Bayesian posterior distribution of the labeling was fed back in as an input, along with its neighborhood features as new features for AdaBoost to use. In validation studies, we compared our results with hand-labeled segmentations by two experts. Using a leave-one-out approach and standard overlap and distance error metrics, our automated segmentations agreed well with human raters; any differences were comparable to differences between trained human raters. Our error metrics compare favorably with those previously reported for other automated hippocampal segmentations, suggesting the utility of the approach for large-scale studies. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据