4.7 Article

Trial-by-trial relationship between neural activity, oxygen consumption, and blood flow responses

期刊

NEUROIMAGE
卷 40, 期 2, 页码 442-450

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.011

关键词

fMRI; neurometabolic coupling; neurovascular coupling

资金

  1. NIBIB NIH HHS [EB003375, R01 EB003375, R01 EB003375-10] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS044589, F32 NS056682, NS044589, R01 NS044589-05A1] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trial-by-trial variability in local field potential (LFP), tissue partial pressure Of Oxygen (PO2), cerebral blood flow (CBF), and deoxyhemoglobin-weighted optical imaging of intrinsic signals (OIS) were tested in the rat somatosensory cortex while fixed electrical forepaw stimulation (1.0-ms pulses with amplitude of 1.2 mA at a frequency of 6 Hz) was repeatedly applied. The changes in the cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2) were also evaluated using a hypotension condition established by our group based on the administration of a vasodilator. Under normal conditions, CBF, PO2, and OIS showed positive signal changes (48%, 32%, and 0.42%, respectively) following stimulation. Over multiple trials, the CBF responses were well correlated with the integral of the LFP amplitudes (Sigma LFP) (R-mean=0.78), whereas a lower correlation was found between PO2 and Sigma LFP (R-mean=0.60) and between OIS and Sigma LFP (R-mean=0.54). Under the hypotension condition the LFP responses were preserved, but the CBF responses were suppressed and the PO2 and OIS changes were negative (-12% and -0.28%, respectively). In this condition, the trial-by-trial variations in PO2 and OIS were well correlated with the variability in Sigma LFPs (R-mean=-0.77 and -0.76, respectively), indicating a single trial coupling between CMRO2 changes and Sigma LFP. These findings show that CBF and CMRO2 signals are more directly correlated with neural activity compared to blood oxygen-sensitive methods such as OIS and BOLD fMRI. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据