4.4 Article

Ameliorating effects and mechanisms of chronic electroacupuncture at ST36 in a rodent model of dyspepsia induced by cisplatin

期刊

NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY
卷 31, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13474

关键词

autonomic functions; chemotherapy-associated dyspeptic syndrome; electroacupuncture; gastric slow wave; gastrointestinal motility

资金

  1. Shannxi National Science Foundation [2018JM7148]
  2. Shannxi Traditional Chinese Medicine administration Foundation [JCMS004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Chemotherapy-associated dyspepsia syndrome (CADS) is among the most intensive side effects and critical concerns for patients with cancer. To investigate the effects and mechanisms of chronic electroacupuncture (EA) at ST36 on chemotherapy-associated dyspeptic symptoms (CADS) in rats. Methods Cisplatin (8 mg/kg, ip) was given once to establish CADS model. EA or sham-EA treatment was then performed one hour daily for 21 days. Key Results (a) EA treatment decreased kaolin intake within 24 hours (1.67 +/- 0.23 g vs 2.36 +/- 0.37 g in sham-EA, P < 0.05); EA increased food intake (9.43 +/- 2.28 vs 4.32 +/- 1.26 in sham-EA, P < 0.05) and cisplatin-induced reduction of body weight (426.38 +/- 13.25 vs 407.92 +/- 13.26 in sham-EA, P = 0.05). (b) The incidence of normal behavioral satiety sequence (53%) in EA group was greater than that in sham-EA (32%) group (X-2 = 17.68, P < 0.01). (c) EA increased the percentage of normal gastric slow waves (82.6 +/- 5.98 vs 22.8 +/- 1.90 in sham-EA, P < 0.05). (d) EA normalized cisplatin delayed gastric emptying (71.3% +/- 6.8% vs 44.6% +/- 11.2% in control, P < 0.05). (e) EA decreased ratio of heart rate variability (0.30 +/- 0.03 vs 0.56 +/- 0.05 in sham-EA, P < 0.05). (f) EA decreased fasting ghrelin, glucagon-like peptide-1 and peptide YY (P < 0.01 vs sham-EA for all). Conclusions and Inferences Chronic EA ameliorates dyspepsia symptom and improves gastric dysmotility induced by Cisplatin, mediated via the vagal and gastrointestinal hormonal mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据