4.4 Article

Release of endogenous opioids during a chronic IBD model suppresses the excitability of colonic DRG neurons

期刊

NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 39-E4

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12008

关键词

dorsal root ganglia; DSS colitis; endogenous opioids; IBD

资金

  1. Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of Canada
  2. CAG-CIHR fellowship
  3. [CONACYT-144872]
  4. [CONACYT-166615]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Endogenous opioids are implicated in pain-regulation in chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We sought to examine whether endogenous opioids suppress the excitability of colonic nociceptive dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons during chronic IBD, and if so, whether modulation of underlying voltage-gated K+ currents was involved. Methods The effects of chronic dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) colitis on afferent signaling in mice was studied using patch clamp recordings. Colonic DRG neurons were identified using Fast Blue retrograde labeling and recordings obtained from small DRG neurons (<40 pF). Key Results In current-clamp recordings, the rheobase of neurons was increased 47% (P < 0.01) and action potential discharge at twice rheobase decreased 23% (P < 0.05) following incubation in colonic supernatants from chronic DSS mice. beta-endorphin increased 14-fold, and tissue opioid immunoreactivity and expression in CD4+ cells observed by flow cytometry increased in chronic DSS colons. Incubation of naive neurons in the l-opioid receptor agonist D-Ala(2), N-MePhe(4), Gly-ol (DAMGO) (10 nM) partially recapitulated the effects of supernatants from DSS mice on rheobase. Supernatant effects were blocked by the l-opioid receptor antagonist naloxone. In voltage clamp, chronic DSS supernatants and DAMGO increased I-A K+ currents. Conclusions & Inferences The release of endogenous opioids during chronic inflammation in mice suppresses the excitability of nociceptive DRG neurons. Targeting immune cells may provide a novel means of modulating IBD pain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据