4.4 Article

Delayed gastric emptying rates and impaired antral motility in children fulfilling Rome III criteria for functional abdominal pain

期刊

NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY
卷 24, 期 5, 页码 420-+

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01871.x

关键词

abdominal pain; antral motility; child; functional gastrointestinal disorder; gastric emptying

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Gastric sensorymotor dysfunctions have been implicated in the pathophysiology of some functional gastrointestinal disorders, such as functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome. Therefore, we hypothesized that abnormal gastric emptying and impaired antral motility are possible underlying mechanisms of symptoms in children with functional abdominal pain (FAP). Methods Hundred and two children [37 (36.3%) males, 4-14 years, mean 7.8 years, SD 2.7 years] fulfilling Rome III criteria for FAP were recruited for this study. An age and sex compatible group of healthy children (n = 20) were selected as controls [8 (40%) males, 4-14 years, mean 8.4 years, SD 3.0 years]. Liquid gastric emptying rate (GER) and antral motility parameters (amplitude of antral contractions, frequency of antral contractions and antral motility index) were assessed using a previously reported ultrasound method. Key Results Average GER (42.1% vs 66.2% in controls), amplitude of antral contractions (56.5% vs 89%), frequency of contractions per 3 min (8.5 vs 9.3), and antral motility index (4.9 vs 8.3) were significantly lower in patients with FAP compared with controls (P < 0.01). Fasting antral area was higher in patients (1.4 vs 0.6, P < 0.0001). GER negatively correlated with the scores obtained for severity of abdominal pain (r = -0.29, P = 0.004). Conclusions & Inferences Gastric emptying rate and antral motility parameters were significantly impaired in patients with FAP and GER negatively correlated with symptom severity. These findings highlight the possible role of gastrointestinal motility abnormalities in the pathophysiology of childhood FAP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据