4.4 Article

Visceral and somatic sensory function in functional dyspepsia

期刊

NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 246-+

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12044

关键词

Functional dyspepsia; functional gastrointestinal disorders; sensitization; sensory testing; somatic pain; visceral pain

资金

  1. Singapore National Medical Research Council, Individual Research Grant [NMRC/1120/2007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Visceral hypersensitivity is one of the proposed underlying mechanisms in functional dyspepsia (FD). It is not clear whether visceral hypersensitivity in FD is a manifestation of a central sensitization also encompassing somatic sensitization. Transient receptor potential vanilloid-1 (TRPV1) pathways are involved in gastric mechanosensory physiology and the TRPV1 receptor agonist, capsaicin, has been used as a chemical stimulant. Methods In this double-blind, randomized study we evaluated both visceral and somatic sensory function in 34 FD patients and 42 healthy controls using quantitative sensory testing. Visceral pain sensitivity was assessed using a validated gastric pain model with oral capsaicin capsule titration and somatic pain sensitivity was determined by foot heat and hand electric stimulation. Key Results The median capsaicin dose required to attain moderate pain was 0.5mg in FD and 1mg in controls (P = 0.03). At these doses, mean pain intensities on a 0-100 visual analog scale were greater for FD than controls [56.9 (95% confidence intervals, 52.2-61.5) vs 45.1 (41.6-48.6), resp.] (P = 0.005). Overall, mean somatic sensory and pain thresholds were similar in FD and control groups, but in a subgroup of FD pain hypersensitivity was seen on the hand and on the foot at different stimulation thresholds. Conclusions & Inferences A majority of patients with FD have visceral chemo-hypersensitivity involving TRPV1 pathways. A substantial subgroup also has somatic hypersensitivity as evidence of central sensitization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据