4.4 Article

The role of somatosensory cortical regions in the processing of painful gastric fundic distension: an update of brain imaging findings

期刊

NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY
卷 20, 期 5, 页码 479-487

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2007.01045.x

关键词

cytoarchitectonic probability maps; functional brain imaging; gastric fundus distension; somatosensory cortex

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Painful gastric distension is processed in a network consisting of brainstem, thalamus, insula, anterior cingulate cortex, (lateral) orbitofrontal and prefrontal cortex, superior temporal cortex and cerebellum. However, the role of primary and secondary somatosensory cortical regions (SI/SII) in the processing of visceral sensation or pain in general and gastric sensation in particular remains unclear. The aim of this study was to localize activations in the SI/SII area from our previously published functional brain imaging studies on gastric distension more precisely, using newly available cytoarchitectonic probability maps of SI/SII, implemented in the SPM Anatomy toolbox. In healthy volunteers, we found two clusters to be overlapping with SII (mainly the OP4 subregion) and, to a lesser extent, SI, although this overlap was small in size. In functional dyspepsia patients, we found two clusters to be overlapping with SII (mainly OP4), of which the cluster in the right hemisphere also overlapped with SI. These findings were confirmed in a conjunction analysis of both groups. Activation in right SI/SII was significantly higher in healthy volunteers when formally compared to patients. These results provide more detailed information on the brain processing of gastric sensation, supporting the hypothesis that SI/SII are involved. This is in line with some previously published studies on visceral sensation, but at variance with some other studies. Methodological differences between the brain imaging studies on gastric distension may account for these somewhat discrepant findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据