4.4 Article

Metabolic Syndrome and Cognition in Patients with Manifest Atherosclerotic Disease: The SMART Study

期刊

NEUROEPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 34, 期 2, 页码 83-89

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000264825

关键词

Atherosclerotic disease; Cognition; Metabolic syndrome; SMART Study

资金

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research-Medical Sciences [904-65-095]
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research [917-66-311]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: It is unclear whether the metabolic syndrome (MetS) increases risk of cognitive dysfunction beyond the level expected from its individual components. We examined the association of MetS with cognitive dysfunction and assessed whether MetS increased risk of cognitive dysfunction more than that of the sum of its individual components. Methods: Data on 823 participants were used from the SMART-study, a cohort study among patients with atherosclerotic disease. MetS was defined according to the NCEP-ATPIII-criteria. Neuropsychological tests assessing memory, executive, and visuospatial functioning were performed. Regression analyses were performed to assess the association of MetS and its individual components with cognitive dysfunction. To examine whether MetS increased risk of cognitive dysfunction beyond its individual components we tested whether there was interaction on an additive scale by calculating the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI). Results: MetS was associated with increased risk of memory (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1-3.3) and visuospatial dysfunction (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.4-2.7) but not with executive dysfunction. However, risk of memory and visuospatial dysfunction for having all MetS components was not greater than that of the sum of the individual components (RERI 0.2 and -0.9). Conclusions: In this population, MetS is related to increased risk of cognitive dysfunction but not more than that of the sum of its individual components. Copyright (c) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据