4.4 Article

Defeminization of Brain Functions by a Single Injection of Estrogen Receptor α or β Agonist in Neonatal Female Rats

期刊

NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 95, 期 4, 页码 297-304

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000332128

关键词

Estrogen receptor subtypes; Sexual differentiation; Lordosis; Estrous cycle; Estrogen receptor agonists

资金

  1. MEXT of Japan, Kakenhi [21570070]
  2. Kibankeisei
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21570070] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sexual differentiation of brain function is regulated by estrogen in the perinatal period of rodents. However, the role of the estrogen receptor subtypes ER alpha and ER beta is still in question. Accordingly, the effects of neonatal treatment with the ERa agonist propyl pyrazole trio! (PPT) or the ER beta agonist diarylpropionitrile (DPN) on female reproductive functions were investigated in rats. Female rats were injected subcutaneously with 100-500 mu g/10 g body weight (b.w.) PPT or DPN, 100 mu g/10 g b.w. estradiol (E-2), or saline at day 5 (birth day = day 1), and then vaginal opening and vaginal smears were examined. On day 60, their ovaries were removed and lordosis behavior was observed after subcutaneous implantation of a silicon tube containing E-2. As a result, in most PPT and all E-2 rats, vaginal opening was advanced and an irregular estrous cycle was observed. In contrast, in most rats of the DPN groups, vaginal opening was comparable to that of the control and there was a regular estrous cycle. Lordosis tests revealed that the mean lordosis quotients (LQs) in the 250- and 500-mu g PPT groups was lower than in the saline group, but higher than in the E-2 group. Mean LQs in all DPN groups were comparable to those in the saline group. These results suggest that ER alpha plays a major role in masculinization of the system regulating the estrous cycle in the rat brain. In behavioral defeminization of the lordosis-regulation system, ERa was also found to be the main target of estrogen. Copyright (C) 2012S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据