4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Dual Effects of Statins on Aβ Metabolism: Upregulation of the Degradation of APP-CTF and Aβ Clearance

期刊

NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES
卷 10, 期 1-4, 页码 305-308

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000334534

关键词

Statin; A beta clearance; Amyloid precursor protein

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23390187, 24659349, 21390222] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: Retrospective cohort studies have suggested that statin users have a lower prevalence of dementia. On the other hand, a randomized controlled study failed to show beneficial effects on the cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, a prospective cohort study demonstrated that users of statins had a lower incidence of AD. One possible interpretation might be that statins could prevent or delay the onset of AD, but not slow cognitive decline once the disease has set in. Given that statins could prevent or delay the onset of AD, what is the responsible mechanism? Methods: We investigated the effect of fluvastatin on A beta metabolism at a clinically relevant dose in mice. Results: Fluvastatin reduced the brain A beta level by increased trafficking of the carboxyl terminal fragment of the amyloid precursor protein (APP-CTF), which was mediated by inhibition of protein isoprenylation. Moreover, the statin reduced the brain A beta level through enhanced A beta clearance mediated by upregulation of low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP-1) expression. The statin increased LRP-1 expression, mediated by inhibition of protein isoprenylation. Conclusion: Statins might prevent the onset of AD through reduced A beta production by enhancement of APP-CTF degradation and/or upregulation of A beta clearance. We also showed that promotion of APP-CTF degradation and upregulation of A beta clearance could be modified by a drug, suggesting possible mechanistic targets for disease-modifying drugs. Copyright (C) 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据