4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Biomarkers for the early detection of Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease

期刊

NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES
卷 5, 期 3-4, 页码 133-136

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000113682

关键词

biomarkers for early diagnosis; Parkinson's disease; Alzheimer's disease; transcranial ultrasound; neuroimaging; genetic vulnerability; cerebrospinal fluid markers; olfactory dysfunction; REM sleep behavior disorder

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the aging population of many countries in the world, neurodegenerative diseases like Parkinson's disease (PD) are becoming an increasing burden. Therefore, early therapy and ultimately disease prevention is essential, which is only possible with an early diagnosis. Besides a genetic predisposition, a number of biomarkers are being discussed to indicate vulnerability to PD, some of them many years before disease manifestation. These include hyperechogenicity of the substantia nigra as well as premotor symptoms like olfactory and autonomic dysfunction, depression, REM sleep behavior disorder, and neuropsychological impairment. Moreover, first signs of affection of the substantial nigra like PET and SPECT abnormalities and slight motor signs can be included, as they may be detected before a definite diagnosis according to motor symptoms can be made. Interestingly, other frequent neurodegenerative disorders like Alzheimer's disease (AD) are also characterized by a long preclinical period, with several biomarkers discussed as indicative for disease vulnerability including cerebrospinal fluid, serum, and neuroimaging biomarkers, olfactory dysfunction as well as subtle neuropsychological deficits. However, future studies are necessary, which establish the predictive value of these markers singularly and in combination to detect a subgroup of the population at risk for PD and AD not only to accelerate research on etiology and pathophysiology but also to promote testing for neuroprotective strategies. Copyright (c) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据