4.4 Article

Impact of Delayed Transfer of Critically Ill Stroke Patients from the Emergency Department to the Neuro-ICU

期刊

NEUROCRITICAL CARE
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 75-81

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12028-010-9347-0

关键词

Acute ischemic stroke; Emergency medicine; Neurocritical care; Hospital bed capacity; Resource utilization

资金

  1. NINDS/NIH [P50 NS049060]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We sought to determine the effect of emergency department length of stay (ED-LOS) on outcomes in stroke patients admitted to the Neurological Intensive Care Unit (NICU). We collected data on all patients who presented to the ED at a single center from 1st February 2005 to 31st May 2007 with acute ischemic stroke (AIS), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 12 h of symptom onset. Data collected included demographics, admission/discharge National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), discharge modified Rankin Score (mRS), and total ED length of stay. The effect of ED-LOS on discharge mRS, discharge NIHSS, and hospital LOS was assessed by logistic regression. Poor outcome was defined as mRS a parts per thousand yen4 at discharge. Of 519 patients presenting to the ED, 75 (15%) were critically ill and admitted to the NICU (mean age 65 +/- A 14 years, 31% men, and 37% Hispanic). Admission diagnosis included AIS (49%), ICH (47%), TIA (1%), and others (3%). Median ED-LOS was 5 h (IQR 3-8 h) and median hospital LOS was 7 days (IQR 3-15 days). In multivariate analysis, predictors of poor outcome included admission ICH (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-4.3), NIHSS a parts per thousand yen6 (OR, 6.4; 95% CI, 2.3-17.9), and ED-LOS a parts per thousand yen5 h (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.6-8.8). There was no association between ED-LOS and discharge NIHSS among survivors or total hospital LOS. Among critically ill stroke patients, ED-LOS a parts per thousand yen5 h before transfer to the NICU is independently associated with poor outcome at hospital discharge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据