4.6 Article

Clustering by defining and merging candidates of cluster centers via independence and affinity

期刊

NEUROCOMPUTING
卷 315, 期 -, 页码 486-495

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2018.07.043

关键词

Clustering; Kernel density estimation; Cutoff distance; Independence; Affinity

资金

  1. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [City U 11201315]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61601431]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clustering analysis is to classify elements into categories based on their similarity. Clustering by fast search and find of density peaks (CFSFDP) has been proven to be an effective and novel algorithm, which identifies the centers of clusters with density maxima. However, the performance of CFSFDP is quite sensitive to the estimation of densities, that is exactly the selection of the cutoffdistance (d(c)). In a conventional way, the selection of d(c) is based on subjective experience. It meets difficulties in finding an appropriate d(c), especially for detecting nonspherical clusters, because CFSFDP cannot perform well when there are more than one density peak for one cluster. Besides, another barrier of applying CFSFDP is that manual interaction is always required for making an effective selection of cluster centers. In this paper, a new density-based clustering algorithm, clustering by defining and merging candidates of cluster centers via independence and affinity (CDMC-IA), is proposed. With its strategy, an appropriate value of cutoffdistance d(c) can be well suggested and the robustness of the method itself is enhanced. Moreover, CDMC-IA introduces a new quantity independence to sort and select cluster centers, instead of human based selection from decision graph. Another quantity affinity is also introduced, which well handles multiple density peaks existing in one cluster and is able to assign each data point to the its targeted cluster. The performance of applying conventional clustering methods to benchmark datasets will be compared with the proposed method in this paper. (c) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据