4.6 Article

A causal feature selection algorithm for stock prediction modeling

期刊

NEUROCOMPUTING
卷 142, 期 -, 页码 48-59

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2014.01.057

关键词

Stock prediction; Data mining; Feature selection; Causal discovery; V-structure

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71271061, 70801020]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China [2010B010600034, 2012B091100192]
  3. Ministry of Education Innovation Team Development Plan
  4. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation Research Team
  5. Business Intelligence Key Team of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies [S2013030015737, IRT1224, TD1202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A key issue of quantitative investment (QI) product design is how to select representative features for stock prediction. However, existing stock prediction models adopt feature selection algorithms that rely on correlation analysis. This paper is the first to apply observational data-based causal analysis to stock prediction. Causalities represent direct influences between various stock features (important for stock analysis), while correlations cannot distinguish direct influences from indirect ones. This study proposes the causal feature selection (CFS) algorithm to select more representative features for better stock prediction modeling. CFS first identifies causalities between variables and then, based on the results, generates a feature subset. Based on 13-year data from the Shanghai Stock Exchanges, comparative experiments were conducted between CFS and three well-known feature selection algorithms, namely, principal component analysis (PCA), decision trees (DT; CART), and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). CFS performs best in terms of accuracy and precision in most cases when combined with each of the seven baseline models, and identifies 18 important consistent features. In conclusion, CFS has considerable potential to improve the development of QI product. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据