4.6 Article

Nonlinear process fault pattern recognition using statistics kernel PCA similarity factor

期刊

NEUROCOMPUTING
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 298-308

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2013.04.042

关键词

Fault pattern recognition; Similarity factor; Kernel principal component analysis; Statistics pattern analysis

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China [ZR2011FM014]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61273160]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [10CX04046A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Data-driven fault diagnosis technique has exhibited its wide applications in industrial process monitoring. However, how to recognize fault pattern based on process dataset is still a difficult problem in data-driven fault diagnosis field. In this paper, a novel nonlinear fault recognition method is proposed based on statistics kernel principal component analysis similarity factor (SKPCASF), which combines nonlinear similarity factor and statistics pattern analysis. Principal component analysis similarity factor (PCASF) is firstly reviewed which measures the similar degree of two datasets by comparing their principal component subspaces. In order to deal with nonlinear characteristics of process dataset, kernel principal component analysis (KPCA) is applied to build a nonlinear similarity factor, referred to as KPCA similarity factor (KPCASF). Moreover, for well utilizing the statistical information of data variables, statistics pattern analysis is used to compute data statistics for substituting for the original measured variables in fault recognition. Based on the statistics, a new similarity factor method called as statistics KPCA similarity factor (SKPCASF) is lastly built for fault pattern recognition. Simulations on a simple nonlinear system and the benchmark Tennessee Eastman process show that the proposed SKPCASF method is more effective than PCASF and KPCASF in terms of fault pattern recognition performance. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据