4.6 Article

Multiway kernel independent component analysis based on feature samples for batch process monitoring

期刊

NEUROCOMPUTING
卷 72, 期 7-9, 页码 1584-1596

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2008.09.003

关键词

Batch process; Nonlinearity; Kernel independent component analysis; Feature samples

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most batch processes generally exhibit the characteristics of nonlinear variation. In this paper, a nonlinear monitoring technique is proposed using a multiway kernel independent component analysis based on feature samples (FS-MKICA). This approach first unfolds the three-way dataset of a batch process into the two-way one and then chooses representative feature samples from the large two-way input training dataset. The nonlinear feature space abstracted from the unfolded two-way data space is then transformed into a high-dimensional linear space via kernel function and an independent component analysis (ICA) model is established in the mapped linear space. The proposed FS-MKICA method can significantly reduce the computational cost in extracting the kernel ICA model since it is based on the small subset of feature samples rather than on the entire input sample set. We supply two statistics, the 12 statistic of process variation and the squared prediction error statistic of residual, for on-line monitoring of batch processes. The proposed method is applied to detecting faults in the fed-batch penicillin fermentation process. The standard linear ICA method for batch process monitoring, known as the multiway independent component analysis (MICA), is also applied to the same benchmark batch process. The simulation results obtained in this nonlinear batch process application clearly demonstrate the power and superiority of the new nonlinear monitoring method over the linear one. The FS-MKICA approach can extract the nonlinear features of the batch process while the MICA method cannot. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据