4.5 Article

Microglia are the major source of TNF-α and TGF-β1 in postnatal glial cultures; regulation by cytokines, lipopolysaccharide, and vitronectin

期刊

NEUROCHEMISTRY INTERNATIONAL
卷 63, 期 1, 页码 47-53

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuint.2013.04.007

关键词

Microglia; Astrocytes; Activation; TNF-alpha; TGF-beta 1; Vitronectin

资金

  1. National Multiple Sclerosis Society [JF 2125A1/1, FG 1879-A-1]
  2. NIH [NS060770]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Damage to the central nervous system (CNS) leads to increased production of TNF-alpha and TGF-beta 1 cytokines that have pro- or anti-inflammatory actions, respectively. To define whether astrocytes or microglia express these cytokines, prior studies have used mixed glial cultures (MGC) to represent astrocytes, thought these results are inevitably complicated by the presence of contaminating microglia within MGC. To clarify the cellular source of these cytokines, here we employed a recently described method of preparing microglia-free astrocyte cultures, in which neural stem cells (NSC) are differentiated into astrocytes. Using ELISA to quantify cytokine production in three types of glial culture: MGC, pure microglia or pure astrocytes, this showed that microglia but not astrocytes, produce TNF-alpha, and that this expression is increased by LPS, IFN-gamma, and to a lesser extent by vitronectin, but decreased by TGF-beta 1. In contrast, TGF-beta 1 was produced by microglia and astrocytes, though at 10-fold higher levels by microglia. TGF-beta 1 expression in microglia was increased by vitronectin and to a lesser extent by TNF-alpha and LPS, but astrocyte TGF-beta 1 expression was not regulated by any factor tested. In summary, our data reveal that microglia, not astrocytes are the major source of TNF-alpha and TGF-beta 1 in postnatal glial cultures, and that microglial production of these antagonistic cytokines is tightly regulated by cytokines, LPS, and vitronectin. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据