4.5 Review

Genetics and iron in the systems biology of Parkinson's disease and some related disorders

期刊

NEUROCHEMISTRY INTERNATIONAL
卷 62, 期 5, 页码 637-652

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuint.2012.11.015

关键词

Parkinson's disease; Systems biology; PARK genes; Iron; GWAS; Holistic analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The systems biology approach to complex diseases recognises that a potentially large number of biochemical network elements may be involved in disease progression, especially where positive feedback loops can be identified. Most of these network elements will be encoded by genes, for which different alleles may affect the network(s) differentially. A primary requirement is therefore to determine the relevant gene-network relationships. A corollary of this is that identification of the network should thereby allow one to 'explain' or account for any genetic associations. We apply this approach to Parkinson's disease, a disease characterised by apoptotic death of neurons of the substantia nigra, and coupled significantly to a derangement of iron metabolism. We thereby account for the involvement of various genes and biochemical pathways associated with Parkinsonism, including seemingly unconnected ones involving iron, alpha-synuclein, parkin, mitochondrial respiration and biology, ceramide production, lysosome biology, Lewy body formation, and so on. Although such an analysis necessarily recognises that there is no unitary 'cause' of Parkinson's, it also recognises that each of the elements contributing can or does effectively converge on a particular mode of apoptotic cell death in dopaminergic neurons, often involving iron-mediated hydroxyl radical formation. Overall, the systems biology approach allows us to propose at least one coherent synthesis of the rather disparate literature surrounding the aetiology of Parkinson's disease, and thereby to suggest some (synergistic) targets for ameliorating the disease and its progression. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据