4.7 Article

A nonionic surfactant simultaneously enhancing wetting property and electrical conductivity of PEDOT:PSS for vacuum-free organic solar cells

期刊

SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS
卷 137, 期 -, 页码 311-318

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.02.024

关键词

Nonionic surfactant; PEDOT:PSS; Wetting property; Electrical conductivity; Vacuum-free organic solar cells

资金

  1. Recruitment Program of Global Youth Experts
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, HUST [2014YQ013]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2012FFC05401]
  4. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2014M562016]
  5. Foundation of Hubei Educational Committee [Q20122512]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, we report a nonionic surfactant (polyethylene glycol 2,5,8,11-tetramethyl-6-dodecyne-5,8-diol ether, PEG-TmDD) that can improve the wetting property of PEDOT:PSS aqueous solution on the organic photoactive layer and simultaneously enhance the electrical conductivity of PEDOT:PSS film up to 526 S/cm. Furthermore, the conductivity enhancement is significantly dependent on the thermal annealing, which is contrary to the conductivity behavior of PEDOT:PSS film prepared from the formulation added with ethylene glycol (EG) where the conductivity is almost independent of the thermal annealing. The temperature dependence of the conductivity of PEDOT:PSS by PEG-TmDD is possibly ascribed to decomposition of PEG-TmDD into EG and TmDD during thermal annealing. With the high conductivity and good wetting on the active layer, PEDOT:PSS mixed with PEG-TmDD is used as the top electrode for organic solar cells. The cells exhibit a fill factor of 60% and a power conversion efficiency of 4.1% using poly(3-hexylthiophene):indene-C60 bis-adduct as the active layer. The results indicate that the new formulation of PEDOT:PSS mixed with PEG-TmDD is suitable for preparing a top electrode for vacuum-free organic solar cells. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据